Entries tagged as collection societies
Related tags
all2gethernow a2 a2n amanda palmer andreas gebhard andrew dubber artists austin authors berlin berlin music week business business models businessmodels compilation concert conference convention copyright charts creative commons culture diy marketing events gema gema-vermutung jay frank license fee licensing live music longevity marketing monika bestle music business revenue content control dmca download free culture germany jamendo law lawrence lessig music berlin music collaboration connect with fans diy fma free free music free music archive future royalties balance contract membership 12.rästv ard ausstellung bbc commercial services convergence design deutschland eu exhibition kultur kunst mode added value adsense broadcast channel 4 channel 5 choruss content industry creation crisis payment petition ratesMonday, October 12. 2009
Germany's Collection Society GEMA Having a Rollercoaster Ride?
Continue reading "Germany's Collection Society GEMA Having a..." »
Thursday, September 3. 2009
The GEMA Presumption as an Entry Barrier (Pt. 3/3)
At all2gethernow, I am going to discuss the topic as a part of the #camp. Furthermore I’m participating in the discussion on “Collection Societies and Rights Management”. Hopefully, many of you will join us to discuss. Those who can’t be there in person, please join our community. There, you will be able to submit suggestions and comment on anything.
So, please take this series of articles as some kind of basics to what I’m going to discuss with all of you at all2gethernow. No matter whether it’s online or offline. Posts are published day by day.
[English translation of part 3 is coming soon. Due to organisational tasks at all2gethernow, it will take an additional one or two days to translate. Since the text is available in German already, I just posted it in advance for all German readers.]
Teil 1&2 findet Ihr hier:
“Die GEMA-Vermutung als Markteintrittsbarriere (Teil 1/3)”
“Die GEMA-Vermutung als Markteintrittsbarriere (Teil 2/3)”
Glaube ist gut, Wissen ist besser.
Gleichgültig, wie das Urteil eines (notwendigen) Sachverständigen zum Thema aussieht, der Beleg für die Verfügbarkeit einer hinreichenden Größe frei lizensierten Materials muss vor Gericht erbracht werden. Denn die GEMA-Vermutung ist gängige Rechtsprechung und wird erst vor dem BGH endgültig widerlegt werden können. Aber die Schwierigkeit liegt in der Nachprüfbarkeit. Der GEMA liegen neben ihren stets aktuellen Geschäftszahlen natürlich auch die Zahlen der zu verwertenden Titel vor - wo aber sind die belegbaren Zahlen frei lizenzierter Stücke?
Aufmerksamkeit.
Darüber hinaus hat die GEMA Pressesprecher und Lobbyisten. Nicht die Künstler, die ihre Werke GEMA-frei anbieten. Für die Verbraucher existieren letztere Künstler nicht. Selbst wenn international renommierte Künstler wie Trent Reznor oder die Smashing Pumpkins Titel unter Creative Commons veröffentlichen - die Masse des Publikums nimmt es nicht wahr. Es erscheint unwichtig. Die meiste Beachtung für diese Aktionen, Marketingstrategien und teilweise auch Geschäftsmodelle wird den Künstlern durch das Web zuteil. Continue reading "The GEMA Presumption as an Entry Barrier (Pt. 3/3)" »
The GEMA Presumption as an Entry Barrier (Pt. 2/3)
At all2gethernow, I am going to discuss the topic as a part of the #camp. Furthermore I’m participating in the discussion on “Collection Societies and Rights Management”. Hopefully, many of you will join us to discuss. Those who can’t be there in person, please join our community. There, you will be able to submit suggestions and comment on anything.
So, please take this series of articles as some kind of basics to what I’m going to discuss with all of you at all2gethernow. No matter whether it’s online or offline. Posts are published day by day.
For parts 1&3, please go here:
Part 1, Part 3
There are two issues, and each one constitutes a well functioning entry barrier in itself. But, in conjunction they are seamlessly joint: The GEMA presumption, and closely linked the free licence composers’ and providers’ scattered acting.
Why are they that closely linked?
First off, GEMA is responsible for maintaining the GEMA presumption. Secondly, GEMA does not allow members to license selected works under Creative Commons. Free licence composers are kept out of the market without having any organisation representing them. It is plain to see why Germany’s collection society does not want to offer billing and administration of Creative Commons licences (although they could get a good revenue by doing so). But, in the end this results in increasing the demand an alternative to today’s common collection society. Latest by launch of an alternative platform, organisation or institution the GEMA presumption is going to fall. Now this isn’t at all what GEMA wants. Continue reading "The GEMA Presumption as an Entry Barrier (Pt. 2/3)" »





