At
SIIA Industry Summit 2009, Pearson CEO
Marjorie Scardino described the framework for
Financial Times' digital and pricing strategy. Financial Times is published by Pearson.
Sardino, referring to print content, stressed the difference between generic content such as news and the value Financial Times provides by quality analysis. Apart from the brand value, it is in particular the supplier generated extra content which defines the product's market value.
But where is Ralph Lauren?
The newspaper's price has been increased which led to an increase in number of readers too. Now this is what Scardino calls „The Ralph Lauren Effect", in marketing more commonly known as
snob effect.
Certain target audiences have a need to "feel" quality and identity of a product by price. Customers expect exclusiveness and social prestige in buying. You might compare it to car enthusiasts buying a Porsche's sound, or like the fact a vacuum cleaner has to be noisy to be efficient. It is about feeling the product and consumer’s identification with it. Lower the price or reduce the noise – sales figures will go down.
This phenomenon works well with exclusive goods. The price indicates the quality of product.
Print vs. music media
So can digital distribution in print media be compared to music in terms of pricing and product structure? Is it possible to transfer the Ralph Lauren model?
Let us start with one premise: The basic situation to be analysed here differs in print and media. Scardino refers to standing the competition within several print outlets. The core issue in music business is
not based on rivalry. It is about 1) Upon which sources do I generate revenue? and 2) Is there a way to beat piracy?
Continue reading "Might Ralph Lauren Save Digital Distribution of..." »